Thursday, September 04, 2008

Board of Directors Meeting 9/4/2008

After the Pledge of Allegiance, it was announced the recall ballots were invalid.
From the floor we had three people giving their endorsement to our general manager. Selba Campbell was one of them. Selba also said that the Cowen Group will be part of our Bridge Board since they now own island property. She hinted that certain things are cooking that are positive towards our bridge funding.
Reports
Manager’s report was short due to a non board issue speech he wanted to read. It pertained to a reward flier that was posted. The general manager claimed this person owning the phone number on said reward flier has constantly bothered him, his employees and had also threatened him and his wife. Director Burke made a motion to act upon this. The board complied.
The Treasury Report had nothing out of the ordinary to express.
D&E report had conveyed there will be numerous activities for the month of October.
Golf Committee reported they still had $18419 leftover from their fundraisers the previous year and construction on green #6 should be completed by October.
Swimming Pool Committee report said 1988 wrist bands were sold in nine weeks and netted a profit of around $4550 to be spent on pool chairs this year. At the request from the board there are now five more bids that will be considered for the outdoor pool repair.
Audit Committee report on the Rental Department recommended changes in the Declaration, a renter repair checklist, an emergency only list on units to be rented for emergencies, a change in the deep cleaning charges, a change in our advertising, and a rating system.
Security committee recommended three Security companies as finalist. Director Dodson motion Securitas to become our new security replacing Aramark. Motion passed. Aramark is to be given a sixty day notice.
Safety Committee wished to be given more time to recruit volunteers but wanted to immediately to sit down with management and form a better hurricane plan.
Evaluation Committee report said our general manager scored just above satisfactory. Director Dodson moved there were improprieties of this evaluation for allowing the employee to be present not after but during the evaluations proceedings, arguing any low scores, and causing one committee member to resign after being told to change their evaluation. A request to enter a closed session for discussion of this evaluation was voted down.
Old Business
Reflectors to indicate property for sell or rent was tabled to the workshop.
Director McBride had a safety issue and inquired as to why a fire hydrant was out of commission for 10 months so it could be move for $6000 when the hydrant valve could have been relocated to solve the original problem of it being under an owner’s concrete pad and deck. The estimated cost to do this would be under two hundred dollars. It will be an item of discussion at the workshop.
Director Peterson brought up issues with bath house #1. The possibility of a ceiling leak along with the current plans of remodeling. He deemed the plans as unnecessary and overly costly. It will be an item at the workshop.
Time Warner Cable is planned to be operational Jan 1st. Bundle packages will be introduced when received.
Director McBride asked the general manager why the golf course pump has to be shut off at low tide instead of extending the intake pipe further out so as to always be in the water. The cleaning of the screen was the answer.
Director McBride asked if the float valve and the backflow valve was installed for the single phase emergency sewer pipe. Answer was yes.
Emergency Modular Housing idea was downed.
New Business
There will be an employee appreciation party September 19th.
An additional bank account was started at Wells Fargo to protect LIV money under the Federal Insured Limits.
Truck paint and wheels was brought up as a question to our general manager after Director Peterson had been misinformed by office personnel that the work was approved to be done by the board. The general manager became very upset and loudly stated his displeasure in having this subject brought up.
Director Burke motioned that some regular board meetings be scheduled for Saturdays at 9 am. Motion passed.
Motion to accept True Line material for the seawalls was passed along with proper depth considerations.
Lowering the park model minimum height building code rule died from lack of motion.
There will be a modular home seminar in November for those interested. Exact date TBA.
Motion for sea cottage using 30 year TDI approved shingles passed.
Variance for Lot 1 is under review and discussion.
Cowen Group closed on their property on the 25th of August. There was a remark by Director Burke that the seller stated the sold property was to have a land easement through LIV.
Director Steffensen asked who took the director’s pictures away from the glass enclosure. It appears that five pictures were first removed and three more days later.
Meeting called adjourn.

29 comments:

Anonymous said...

So, is the GM in or out??

Anonymous said...

Re: it was announced the recall ballots were invalid.

So, was it stated WHY they were invalid, or just a generic "they are invalid"?

And what about the hell-raising about pool quality issues on this blog this entire summer - or was it all just a bunch of crap?

And what about the manager - in or out? All your blog says it that the evaluation was "just above satisfactory"? No mention of any action taken, if any.

ANd, is there any more info about the Truck and Wheels?

Anonymous said...

Invalid because many were not signed, not sealed, no return address, no date on many, not filed correctly, and not sent to a named person to sponsor their votes. Director Mulch said the voting for years has been done wrong. So you name it on what was invalid.
The outdoor pool is still an accident waiting to happen when there are more than thirty people at a time using it.
This month the manager is in. It says in the article the motion to recess to an executive meeting for discussion on the evaluation was voted down by the majority so no action was taken.
Wheels, no more than a 3 way mistake, for the employee for saying it, Jim believing it, and the general manager for telling Jim never to talk to him.

Anonymous said...

Re: Manager's Report. Has the BOD voted to act on the GM and cohort for threatening and harassing Cheryl Vaughn. And what's the flyer all about. As far as the actual managers' report goes, he probably hasn't done anything to report - isn't one of his favorite phrases "uh, we're working on it."

Anonymous said...

Re: Invalid ballots....

Apparently the SGG's personal attorney did not give them good advice. Their attorney should have known better. Most of the time said atty lets everyone know how smart they are. In any event we should all be happy that the "recall" problem is probably over. Now the village needs to deal with replacing the GM. The sooner the BOD replaces the GM the quicker things can get back to normal.

Anonymous said...

Regarding the evaluation:

It is NO surprise that it came out as "above average". The GM was on his own evaluation committee, plus it was headed by PB with Mary and LeRoy backing her up.

The BOD and citizens of LIV should just think of the report as a comedy. All the report did was take up time that could be spent on more important matters.

Anonymous said...

RE:Wheels, no more than a 3 way mistake, for the employee for saying it, Jim believing it, and the general manager for telling Jim never to talk to him.

What please explain? TRUCKS AND WHEELS.

So is PB saying that Cowen will go through LIV property? Is it a done deal?

Joey looking forward to hear your take on the meeting.

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous said...

Thanks by the way, to the blogmaster, for keeping us all informed when we can't be there! Your blog is a great resource for info, especially since the official Long Island Village web site is rarely updated with current or relevant information.

Anonymous said...

Joey would you please tell us about this "truck/wheels" thing? There seems to be some confusion.

Joey said...

This could be incorrect but from the information that I have received it seems our general manager is innocent of any wrong doing. Supposedly a member or members from our board, while at a town hall meeting, approved for the use of funds to replace the general manager’s tires due to the damage they sustained from running over hurricane debris on the streets. This also coincides with what was told to Director Peterson by an office employee who may have interpreted this as being approved by the board.

Anonymous said...

I have noticed that no one has mention the "cackling chorus" that has been "cackling" for the past year at the BOD Meeting & the Coffee. This is a group of women who cheer, clap, and say yea, etc etc when ever the GM speaks. The "chorus" also "boos" and tells people to be quite when a statement is made that does not favor the GM. When Director Burke was Prez she did nothing about the “chorus”, yet cut others off when they did not agree with the GM (in a rude manner). This happened even when people were recognized and were allowed to speak.

Many people, who were/are offended by this behavior, thought it would be different with a new Prez. It is not. While President Sullivan has not been rude he certainly hasn't shut down the "cackling chorus". This is not proper behavior for a BOD meeting.

Our Village has had too much upset, stress and problems the last 18 months to have turmoil in the BOD meeting. The President MUST take control of the meeting. If the "cackling chorus" sings (so to speak), warn them once politely. The second time ask them to leave. This same advice applies to others, rather they be pro or con on the GM or the topic being discussed. If necessary appoint a sergeant at arms or hire an off duty law enforcement officer from either PI, SPI or Cameron County Sherriff’s.They could act as Sargent at Arms.

The Directors should also hold themselves to these standards, if not higher. If a Director
gets out of had and starts to rant and rave (no names will be mentioned) then they should be politely told to set down or leave the meeting.

As a village we have too many important things that need to be done to have such petty
childish distractions. Our BOD need to work together to solve the village problems, not
spend their time fighting another Director or watching their back.

There isn’t much one person writing on a blog can do. If just a few people, then a few more would call, email or “snail mail” letters to various Directors then we might see some improvement.

Anonymous said...

Joey I really think you should ask the treasurer or the Prez if tires or any thing else was purchased for the GM . When you say I don't know if its correct or not, but this is what I understand" leads me to think you received this info from a passerby and not a creditabile soruce.A name would be nice!
Your information is very valuable to all. I can understand opinions and I respect yours really! You are in a position to know facts. Gossip, speculation and untruths are to left to the rest of us. This BLOG you have created has made an impact on me. At times it make me ill. But I surely see the ugliness of people. People I have grown to respect, admire, and looked up to. Its not to say they are not great people, it to say I am not a realist I am a idealist.

By the way did you get any notes on the workshop?

Joey said...

I will try.It may take a while. There was no workshop after this regular meeting, only Coffee W/ Directors meetings.

Anonymous said...

The meeting synopsis filed to mention that the new security company will cost $30,000 more per year and is the same company we previously employed whose guards were caught stealing from the village!

With a higher bridge assessment, higher security costs, and higher lawyer fees, where is the money coming from? You all know it--higher condo fees.

I can set the record straight. The managers truck tires and paid job were paid from his own personal monies. The confusion may have come from the park truck and replacement of it's tires.

It's too back the synopsis writer of this blog can't take a more object view. For many owners, this is the only source of village information. But being a board members wife, what can one expect?

Anonymous said...

THANK YOU to Anonymous for asking if the "GM and his cohort" had received any action from the BOD for threatening and harassing the Vaughans. In my estimation the GM is "the pot calling the kettle black." We have documentation of our threats; does Larry have documentation or proof of what he is claiming?

Anonymous said...

I agree with the above, get rid of a lot of this negative stuff and make this blog meaningful and not just your opinions and I said he said bs.

Anonymous said...

this trucks and wheels thing is another example of rumors and gossip that should not even make it to this blog

Anonymous said...

Ballots not valid...last election not valid...explains how the three directors in question got voted in, doesn't it?

Anonymous said...

Just a few weeks from now the BOD will have another meeting. I am speaking of the meeting itself and not the coffee. As I understand it, IF all 9 of the Directors are present there is a good chance a vote will be taken reliving the General Manager. This important meeting and vote has been a long time coming. The BOD needs to take steps and make plans right now to make sure the proceedings are handled in a professional manner.

The agenda should be very short, dealing only with the most urgent matters. The vote regarding reliving the GM should be last.

The residents who wish to speak on any agenda item are limited to two minutes. This was the time limit in the past. It should be enforced now. The previous Prez certainly did.

Everyone at the meeting, residents and BOD member alike, need to be aware that outbursts will not be tolerated. Another comment suggested a Sergeant at Arms needs to be appointed. Perhaps an off duty law in forcement officer would be good as this person needs to be unbiased and not be involved with LIV. People who are acting in an inappropriate manner should be warned once. If said behavior continues they should be removed from the meeting. This applies to both pro and con opinions regarding the GM. Under no circumstances should be meeting be stopped.

The President needs to have control for once!! While I sincerely like President Sullivan, and count him as a friend, he does not control the ranting, raving and outbursts. This does not mean he isn’t a good person, he is. We all have our strong and weak points.

The vote to relive the GM needs to be taken WITHOUT going into a Executive Session. Once the vote is taken then the appropriate action to relieve the GM should be started at once. The sooner he is gone the sooner things can return to normal.

This GM problem has been going on since the end of April. It is time for it to stop. Our, once happy and pleasant village is now divided. People who have been friends for ten, fifteen, twenty years no longer have anything to do with each other. Other people are ignored and treated rudely at the card groups and other activities they have always enjoyed. This is a horrible way to treat your neighbor. And it is all because of an incompetent General Manger and a small group of people who want him to stay (still haven’t figured that out).

I apologize for this being so long, but this GM TERMINATION PROBLEM has to end! The vote regarding the GM must take place ASAP. Delaying the vote is totally unfair to the GM, his family and LIV.

The BOD must take action NOW so the other problems at LIV can be dealt with and people can start to rebuild their lives and even their friendships.

Anonymous said...

Just curious as to how much of the GM's performance evaluation is being discussed in an open board meeting in front of all owners, owners' friends, other Aramark employees, whoever else is present at these meetings, etc? Personnel records being confidential and protected by federal law, it's highly inappropriate, indeed ILLEGAL, to discuss employee performance with any entity other than a potential employer of that employee.

Title 3, Chapter 103, Sect 103.003 of the Texas Labor Code authorises an employer to "disclose information about a current or former employee's job performance to a prospective employer of the current or former employee on the request of the prospective employer or the employee." IT DOES NOT AUTHORISE DISCLOSURE TO ANYONE OTHER THAN A PROSPECTIVE EMPLOYER!
So all the owners and other employees present at these open board meetings have been advised of the GM's performance evaluation.

In addition to the GM being an employee of Aramark, the Aramark contract as well as the Association's own GM evaluation form, establishes an employee-employer realtionship between GM and Long Island Board, as defined in Section 103.002 of the same code.

If I was GM, I would be suing the heck out of LIV for damages to professional reputation, loss of future earnings, etc!

Anonymous said...

GM should be pretty upset about the security change. He will get a substantial cut in pay from Aramark.
But we will have a real security company now.

Anonymous said...

What's up with the GM spending over $6,000 of our money to move that fire hydrant when he could have moved the valve for a fraction of that cost? Has this hydrant honestly been out of service for almost a year? I've been to all the meetings & I've never heard any bid's, motions, or even discussion about it. Who approved it?

Anonymous said...

Being unable to personally drop a suggestion in the box can we email one to whoever???? and have it read at the meetings?

Maybe there can be a form on the LIV website that you can download with your name and email address with a security code to prove its authenticity.

Joey said...

Just a note, there was an apparent upgrade to this blog early Sunday, Sept 7th. Comments left during this time may have not registered. Resend if not posted. Also sorry for the slow posting, I've been busy. Thanks

Anonymous said...

RE: e mailing the BOD
The e mail addresses of the BOD are on the LIV website. I'm sure they would enjoy hearing from residents.

Anonymous said...

I'm glad the Security company issue was approved. I for one will feel safer once we have security guidelines and expectations that will be supervised.
A comment was made that it will cost more...maybe, but the money could come from the GM's salary, since he makes much more than he deserves.

Anonymous said...

Who out there wants a GM with a mediocre rating on his evaluation?
Not me!

Anonymous said...

Ya, like I want Doctors, Lawyers and Indian Chiefs that graduated in the top of their class, not middle or below.

And when it comes to running the multi-million dollar organization in which I am an owner, I want a manager who has had a high quality rating and a proven track record in resort management.

If this GM had had a fair and true evaluation, the rating would have been far less than mediocre.